Comments on: DNSSEC verification with dig https://backreference.org/2010/11/17/dnssec-verification-with-dig/ Proudly uncool and out of fashion Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:55:07 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.2 By: waldner https://backreference.org/2010/11/17/dnssec-verification-with-dig/#comment-25051 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:55:07 +0000 http://backreference.org/?p=2749#comment-25051 In reply to Aleksandar.

So it seems they haven't got it yet.

]]>
By: Aleksandar https://backreference.org/2010/11/17/dnssec-verification-with-dig/#comment-25050 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:24:52 +0000 http://backreference.org/?p=2749#comment-25050 In reply to waldner.

That's also all I could find, and that's why I am asking.

]]>
By: waldner https://backreference.org/2010/11/17/dnssec-verification-with-dig/#comment-25049 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:08:44 +0000 http://backreference.org/?p=2749#comment-25049 In reply to Aleksandar.

Where did you read that google.com has DNSSEC? All I can find is that their public DNS resolvers do DNSSEC validation, which is not at all the same thing.

]]>
By: Aleksandar https://backreference.org/2010/11/17/dnssec-verification-with-dig/#comment-25048 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:44:58 +0000 http://backreference.org/?p=2749#comment-25048 Why does it fail on google? I thought they must be DNSSEC enabled. Just wondering if it is some crazy ISP DNS spoofing or google don't have it yet. Because your example domain from above worked for me.

$ dig +sigchase +trusted-key=./root.keys google.com. A | cat -n
1 ;; RRset to chase:
2 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.4
3 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.5
4 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.6
5 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.7
6 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.8
7 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.9
8 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.14
9 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.0
10 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.1
11 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.2
12 google.com. 28 IN A 74.125.228.3
13
14
15
16 Launch a query to find a RRset of type RRSIG for zone: google.com.
17
18 ;; RRSIG is missing for continue validation: FAILED

]]>